|
Fervor Crushes Skepticism About Juan Diego Written by Mar Marn Vida en el Valle Aug 05, 2002
MEXICO, D.F. -- The polemic about the existence of the Indian Juan
Diego and the reasons behind his canonization is now in second place,
due to the expectation generated by the Pope's fifth visit to México to
canonize the first indigenous saint.
John Paul II, who has
confessed his weakness for the Virgin of Guadalupe, the Empress of the
Americas, fulfilled with this visit, from July 30 through Aug. 1, one
of the foremost aspirations of the Mexican Catholic church.
Religious
fervor, exacerbated in the days preceding the arrival of the Pontiff,
has won over debates around the figure of Juan Diego, to whom,
according to tradition, the Brown-Skinned Virgin appeared at the
Tepeyac Hill on December of 1531.
Legend has it that the Virgin
asked Juan Diego, Cuauhtlatohuac (He Who Speaks Like and Eagle) in
indigenous language, that a temple be constructed at the site of her
appearances and, because of Bishop Fray Juan de Zumarraga's
incredulity, she stamped her image on the Indian's ayate, or handwoven
robe.
This proof convinced the bishop and started a cult that
resulted in the construction, in 1976, of the Basílica, which every
year receives more than 20 million faithful from around the world.
Beatified
by John Paul II in 1990, during his second pastoral visit to México,
Juan Diego got to Mexican altars due to another alleged miracle: The
healing of a Mexican young man who had jumped from a 30-foot high
window.
For the Vatican there is no doubt about both miracles
and there is no place for the skepticism voiced by such authorized
voices as that of historian Miguel León Portilla or the polemic former
abbot of the Basílica, Guillermo Schulenburg.
León Portilla, who
in his book 'Tonatzín Guadalupe,' discusses the relationship between
the Mother Goddess worshiped by the Indians in Tepeyac and the Virgin,
considers there are not enough documents to prove the existence of Juan
Diego, much less his work.
In his book, he remembers that the
first testimonials that provided a base for the legend are dated a
century after the supposed appearances, like the story of the Nican
Mophua that, according to León Portilla, was written by a well read
Indian after a bishop asked him to do so.
The historian recently
stated that, "the appearances of the Virgin cannot be historically
verified. They cannot be demonstrated."
In his view, it is
surprising that the memoirs of the monk Zumárraga do not mention Juan
Diego even once, and coincidences between the story of the Guadalupana
and other versions of divine appearances that Spanish missionaries
introduced in Mexico are extraordinary.
According to British
historian David Brading, an expert on Mexican issues, the canonization
responds to the interest of the Church in preserving its presence among
the Indian population, in order to halt the sweeping advance of the
evangelical faith in Latin América.
Brading also believes that
there are no documents to support the Guadalupe miracle and, although
he does not doubt the existence of Juan Diego, he believes that the
image of the Virgin was not imprinted in his robe by miracle but
painted at a later time.
Within the church, the main skeptical
is the former abbot of the Basilica of Guadalupe, Guillermo
Schulenburg, who even wrote to the Vatican to argue against the
canonization.
In spite of the polemic between historians and
church representatives, Mexican devout follow passionately the Church's
efforts to find an adequate face for Juan Diego.
After the
canonization was announced, the Church distributed a poster with an
image of the beatific Juan Diego that looked more like Jesus or Hernán
Cortés than like indigenous people of central México.
Those
posters vanished after the flood of criticism received, but the
institution can count on the collaboration of a young artist who has
organized a "casting" to select a face capable of convincing the market
and the faithful.
Whatever the face of Juan Diego, his success
will be far from that accomplished by the Guadalupana, credited as the
one who grants more miracles to Mexicans, followed by Saint Judas
Tadeo, according to a recent poll. |